have a copy of the original 1st released book. my favorite - i'm 54. haven't seen the movie, but heard it's really good. the book with it's illustrations broadened the gift of my imagination. not sure if i want to see the movie & risk my imagination not staying intact. thinking imagination overrules. maybe someday.
Awaste of film, time ,talent, and money. Nothing happens in this movie; absolutely, nothing. An offence to the Japanese people and boring. I actually fell asleep in this one. Don't waste your time or money!
One Of 2009's Best Movies Of The Year!!!!
Reviewed by freakformovies for Where the Wild Things Are at 2009-11-26 21:36:50
Like " The Blind Side" this is the year's best film's of the year! It's (kind of) funny,but it's mostly sad,depressing and it a little long,but it's in a good way.Yes this movie is a little scary for kids ages 8 and under. Mostly kids ages 9-10+ will get a little scared by the frightening scenes that show in the movie,but they won't get to scared. Mostly kids 10-11+ and (pretty much) all parents will love this movie that is based on the beloved children's book.I gave this movie a four (out of four) stars and bones. I really think kids ?(maybe)10- definitely 11+ and parents who have read and who have loved(and who still love) the book will also love the movie too!
Hound had the fur pulled over his eyes by this one: it's all hackneyed posing. There are interminable brooding shots of Johansson staring out the hotel window, Murray looking out the taxi window, but nothing ever HAPPENS. Both actors do their best, but the director hasn't a gram of wisdom or insight she can bring to the film. (And some of her stereotypes of the Japanese are downright offensive.) The conclusion is trite and hardly worth wading through the turgid waters to witness. Coppola is trading on her name, but her cinema is flat as a board and just as wooden.
KHL has it right - on two counts. This movie is flat, as was Coppola's vastly overrated "Lost in Translation." Nothing happens in terms of character development, brooding cinematography - achingly predictable in both films - substitutes for either narration or impression. One begins to think that Sophia is, indeed, Marie A. Lost in a world she can't fathom or translate, and doomed to play at being cinematic.
Love Sofia Coppola, Hated This Movie
Reviewed by KHL for Marie Antoinette at 2008-04-15 15:19:37
Yes, the costumes look fabulous, the locations are sumptuous, the music is suitable and the acting good, but none of this makes up for the agonizingly slow pace. I wanted to shut it down halfway through. I persisted, but not without wanting to scream in frustration that I wasted over two hours watching this boring epic. I don't know what it was, but I just could not get into it. I don't mind movies with a slow pace (ex. Assassination of Jesse James or anything by Malick, and even Virgin Suicides, Coppola's first flick), but I wouldn't sit through this again if someone paid me.
Newspaper article from: Entertainment Newsweekly; 2/26/2010; 766+ words...America's advertising agency of record, Venables Bell & Partners. They were produced by Park Pictures and directed by LanceAcord. Keywords: Advertise, Advertising, Audi, Automobiles, Marketing, Sports, Television, Transportation. This...