Pier Paolo Pasolini?s ?Theorem? (1968)
Reviewed by actingoutpolitics for Teorema at 2010-07-21 20:02:04
The members of an outstanding but ordinary family each receive a spiritual revelation in this unique film that itself becomes a cinematographic vehicle of this revelation.
While the film protagonists are shaken and forever transformed by the enigmatic spiritual message, Pasolini deploys his film for the purpose of making the viewers to also go through a psychological mutation under its aesthetic guidance. That makes ?Theorem? a highly unusual work of art ? more than just a work of art. Pasolini juxtaposes historical times and Biblical and mythological references, and forces the viewers to become human beings of various historical periods and of all times without losing particularity and concreteness of their circumstantial and historical destiny.
You will find an article about ?Theorem? ?Being Incarnated into Human Form as a Spiritual Revelation? and analysis of the stills from the film (posted on Dec. 28, 2009) at:
George Reeves was fun on TV, Brandon Routh was fine in the newer movie, but Christopher Reeve remains the actor who made the role his. And the movie is a great one, too, against all expectations at the time. Sweeping epic origin story, fantastic (for the time) effects, inspirational music from John Williams, a cast that fill each role brilliantly. Nobody plays Lex Luthor the way Hackman does. The look and feel are still majestic, permitting a sense of awe that is rare in movies.
Wall Street is a cunningly complex film. The screenplay is amazing, the acting is powerful (particularly the on-screen tension between Sheen and Douglas), and the direction (of renowned Oliver Stone) is perfect. Taut, intelligent movies don't get much better than this, folks.
The Donner cut seemed to have a slightly more genuine feel to it.. That being said, I was raised on this version(we didn't have the luxury of different versions when this was released), and it's still fun to watch~
I've seen many Fan versions of SWI and they are better than Lucas' version. I liked the movie as it gives good back story to many characters that I loved in the Classic Trilogy. Jar Jar is not as bad as some people suggest, the voice is terrible, but the character is annoying at worst. I hope some one will do a Re-imagining of SWI someday.
Jar Jar Binks. Need I write more? After waiting so many years for more installments in the "Star Wars" series, fans are disappointed with a childlike, naive, lame story, lame characters, lame dialogue. This film contains tons of positive elements and much potential, but is bad on so many other levels it's ridiculous. Couldn't Lucas surround himself with staff that would force him to realize what parts sucked? I don't get it. Can't wait for someone to remake this film.