HomeHome
 
Movie Reviews Cast & Credits VideoHound Lists News Award Winners Blog Store My VideoHound
Home
Awards Watch
Awards Watch
Awards Watch 
December 15, 2009
The Best Supporting Performances of 2009

As the awards season really ramps up, it’s time to look back at what happened in darkened theaters in 2009, starting with the best supporting work of the year. We’ll get to the best films, best lead performances, and worst films over the next few weeks, but today is dedicated to the men and women who did the best work outside of the main spotlight.


A number of the best films of the year worked because of their extensive, talented ensembles. Within our traditional five-nominee system, there are several films that feature more than one performance that deserves mention in lead and/or supporting including: Nine, An Education, Up in the Air, and A Single Man. Acting class students or teachers would be wise to add Inglourious Basterds, Julie & Julia, Goodbye Solo, The Messenger, and even The Lovely Bones to their Netflix queues. Here are the best of the best when it came to supporting work in 2009.


**********
 
 
BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR


As has happened far too often in recent years, the category of Best Supporting Actor is actually a little difficult to fill in 2009. It's not so much that there weren't a lot of contenders, but rather that few stood above the pack. There were two spectacular supporting performances by the men of the film industry and about eight or nine "good" ones competing for the other three spots in a traditional five-nominee system that so many groups use. Honestly, after a clear winner and personal favorite runner-up, the choices were nearly as difficult as throwing darts at a board. And they were more diverse than usual. From more relatively obscure performances like Red West's striking work in Goodbye Solo to mainstream work like Jackie Earle Haley's movie-stealing portrayal of Rorschach in Watchmen. From small scene-stealers like Peter Capaldi in In the Loop and Christian McKay in Me and Orson Welles to the great Alec Baldwin, an actor who delivered in films both big (It's Complicated) and small (Lymelife). And while Matt Damon rocked in The Informant!, both Joel McHale and Scott Bakula were vastly underrated as the G-men who had to deal with his stream of consciousness existence. But none of them made the cut. These are the five who did:

**********
 
 
Woody Harrelson as Captain Tony Stone in The Messenger
 

Woody Harrelson in The Messenger.


After a period in the mid-1990s when it looked like Harrelson had moved up to the A-list segueing smoothly from Cheers and roles in mega-hits like Indecent Proposal and White Men Can't Jump to critically acclaimed work in Natural Born Killers and his Oscar-nominated turn in The People vs. Larry Flynt. Woody continued to work with some interesting directors, but he took four years off between movies (1999 to 2003) and then made some bad choices. But the talent was always there. We first suspected an A-list comeback was in the works when he popped up in No Country for Old Men. But 2009 was the year of Woody. He had his biggest hit in years with his iconic character (and underrated performance) in franchise-starting Zombieland and nearly stole 2012, but his most notable performance was a dramatic one in The Messenger. Harrelson gives arguably the best performance of his career, truly supporting the dramatic arc of his fellow lead actor, Ben Foster. Will Montgomery is an emotional powder keg, a young man with fire in his eyes that resembles a fuse waiting to be lit. Conversely, Harrelson's Stone is all bottled up, a man whose fire has been replaced by procedure and, more importantly, sadness. There's a deep well of loss right there in Woody's eyes. The shot I think of first when I think of The Messenger is Woody sitting on a couch as years of emotion begins to rise to the surface. What's most remarkable is how genuine it feels. It doesn't feel like “take 12” on a long day of shooting but like someone actually letting down an emotional wall, even if just for a minute. Let's hope that Woody doesn't disappear again. He's capable of delivering work like this every year. He's the aforementioned runner-up, the other spectacular supporting actor performance from 2009.

 

**********
 
 
 
 

Alfred Molina (left), Rosamund Pike, Carey Mulligan,
and Peter Sarsgaard in An Education. Photo © Kerry Brown.

To a lot of movie goers, Molina has become "Hey, it's that guy," even if most ticket buyers don't know his name and probably just know him most distinctly as Doc Ock from Spider-Man 2. Theatre goers and art house movie fans recognize that Molina has been one of the more consistent character actors of the last two decades. He gives the least showy performance in a film filled with remarkable ones and he does so in a character archetype that could have so easily been turned into a two-dimensional cliché – the overprotective father. Nearly every character in An Education starts as a role we've seen before – the naive young girl, the smooth older man, the spinster headmistress, the trophy girlfriend – and writer Nick Hornby and director Lone Scherfig dig deeper to find the realism beneath the archetype. What I find fascinating about Jack is that he falls for the charms of the new man in his daughter's life as much as she does. David (Peter Sarsgaard) represents a changing time, something that Jack says he doesn't want but secretly falls for like everyone else. As David wines and dines Jenny's parents, Jack becomes drawn into the potential of a suave, wealthy future just as much as his daughter and even his overprotective facade falls. Molina takes a relatively quiet, small role and makes it memorable. Again.

 **********


 

Peter Sarsgaard in An Education. Photo © Kerry Brown.

Peter Sarsgaard's performance in An Education has been overshadowed by the praise heaped on Carey Mulligan's lead performance. In fact, I'm a little concerned that the film could be turning into this year's Rachel Getting Married, where one performance was singled out and everything else about the film was forgotten during awards season. Don't forget Sarsgaard. The choices this always-good actor made as David fully support Mulligan's arc as the lead character. Her turn is not the same without his decisions. That's true support. Sarsgaard could have easily turned David into a sleazy lothario, a guy obviously setting out to use Jenny, take her virginity, and discard her. A lot of actors would have telegraphed the final act twist to David's character in every preceding scene. Sarsgaard doesn't take that easy route. As he plays him, David honestly loves Jenny. And, from the minute he meets her, he knows that this gorgeous, confident young lady is way out of his league. Unable to woo her with his charm, he brings out the razzle-dazzle, taking her to fancy parties and introducing her to his more interesting friends. You can practically hear him saying, "I may not be everything you dreamed of, but look at what comes with me." It's a nuanced, brilliant performance that has been vastly underrated this awards season.

 

**********
 
 
Stanley Tucci as Paul Child in Julie & Julia
 

Stanley Tucci in Julie & Julia.


& Stanley Tucci as George Harvey in The Lovely Bones

 

Stanley Tucci in The Lovely Bones.

 

 

Call it cheating, but I just can't choose. Like Molina, Stanley Tucci is one of those "hey, it's that guy" character actors who gave two of the best performances of his already-great career this year in vastly different films. Paul Child and George Harvey couldn't have less in common. The former is the supportive husband to Julia Child and Tucci gives new meaning to the word supporting. Not only does he often serve as the subtle support in scenes with the more showy (not through any fault of her own but simply a part of the character) Meryl Streep but his arc of the film is easily the most successful thing about it. An underplayed subplot of Julie & Julia is that no one can make their dreams come true without the support of a loved one pushing them to do so. Tucci shines in one of the most subtle supporting actor performances of the year. Far less subtle is his work in The Lovely Bones but it's also incredibly memorable, the most effective performance in the film. With George Harvey, Tucci takes a true villain, an absolute scumbag, and makes him feel uncomfortably three-dimensional. Like a lot of great supporting performances, it's in the eyes, most notably in a scene in which he converses with the father of the girl he murdered. With incredibly subtle cues, he plays a man both trying to cover up his own nerves and figure out how much this man knows about what he's done. Nearly every movie could use more Stanley Tucci.

**********
 
 
WINNER
 
 
 

Christoph Waltz in Inglourious Basterds.

The only conceivable argument that Waltz shouldn't win the Oscar for Best Supporting Actor is that he's in the wrong category. Think about it. Hans Landa is in the first and last scene of Inglourious Basterds and he has the most definable arc in the entire film. Who's the lead? Brad Pitt? Come on. If a "name actor" had played Hans Landa, he would have been all over the posters and would have been nominated in that category. Isn't it odd that the size of the actor's resume not the size of his part determines character placement? The best case to be made for this placement is that everyone in Basterds is a supporting performer, working in an ensemble with no actual lead. With that in mind, Waltz is the easy choice for the win and a near lock for the Oscar. Waltz is riveting, playing a Hannibal Lecter-esque character who is easy to despise but impossible to turn away from. Giving a performance that requires four languages, Waltz is a charismatic tour-de-force, arguably the best of the entire year in any category.

 **********

 
BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS


Maybe it's something in the water, but the competition for this five-slot category was just as heated as the men. Once again, the amazing ensemble in An Education needed to be considered but acknowledge Emma Thompson, Olivia Williams, or Rosamund Pike? All three are fantastic and I'll be happy when the film gets a SAG Best Ensemble nod (and hopeful win), but I can't pick a favorite here. Marion Cotillard gave two spectacular performances this year, both turns that I liked more than her Oscar-winning work in La Vie en Rose. She nearly stole Public Enemies and, well, you'll find the other performance below. Rachel Weisz delivered decent work in The Lovely Bones and even better work in The Brothers Bloom, but neither are top five material. Samantha Morton has made a splash in this category several times and proves yet again with her work in The Messenger that she's one of the most subtle actresses of her generation. On the other end of the subtlety spectrum, there's Mo'Nique and her highly acclaimed turn in Precious. Unlike most people, I don't have a strong opinion either way on Mo'Nique, but I do think she's given one evil mother speech too many and her character in Precious somewhat turns into a caricature, something closer to Mommie Dearest
than the realism the film really needed in its final moments. She's good but not in my five. This quintet of ladies is:

**********
 
 
Marion Cotillard as Luisa Contini in Nine
 
 

Marion Cotillard and Daniel Day-Lewis in Nine.

The Weinstein Company is reportedly pushing Marion in lead but that's a mistake. With the women of Nine having such a revolving door of stage time throughout Rob Marshall's film, the entire ensemble should be pushed as supporting actress. Clearly, Harvey doesn't want to split his own vote, but Cotillard is unlikely to make it in lead and deserves to in supporting. She's the emotional through-line in a film that's arguably lacking in honest emotion. Like Marshall's previous films, Nine is a bit cold ... except when Marion is on-screen. She plays the cheated-on wife of Daniel Day-Lewis' director Guido Contini and not only does she have the two most powerful musical numbers in the film but she does the most with her small role. Luisa isn't just a typical embarrassed wife; she's the partner of one of the most famous men in the world and a woman who once had her own time in the spotlight. Cotillard adds deep, sincere melancholy to a role that could have been played purely as anger. She's not just upset that Guido constantly cheats, but she's coming to realize what life as the wife of an egomaniacal director has meant to her own career and happiness. Every single decision Cotillard made in the realization of this character was the right one, truly supporting the entire film by giving it the emotional backbone of which it arguably needed more.

 **********

 
Penélope Cruz as Carla in Nine
 
 

Penélope Cruz in Nine.


If Cotillard is the emotional foundation of Nine, Penélope Cruz is the sexual fire. Introducing her character with a raunchy, lingerie-clad number that will have men wondering why they fought going to see a musical on date night, Cruz steps into the world of Nine with the sexual firepower that won her an Oscar last year for Vicky Cristina Barcelona intact. But, as she's done so often lately with great work in Volver and Vicky Cristina Barcelona, Cruz finds the vulnerability underneath the flawless facade. As Guido hides Carla from the rest of the world, putting her in a sleazy motel by the train station, Carla realizes that she'll never have the status that she so desires by being acknowledged as the muse of one of the great cinematic voices. Her breakdown after confronting Guido at his fancy hotel is a film highlight. It is the rare actress who can play as sexy as Penélope Cruz but also register as something so much deeper than a pretty face. If they hadn't given her the Oscar last year, she'd be more of a frontrunner in this one.

 

**********
 
 
Vera Farmiga as Alex Goran in Up in the Air
 
 

Vera Farmiga in Up in the Air.


Speaking of sexy, how many American actresses are as in as much confident control of their sexuality as Vera Farmiga? And what the hell is it going to take for people to recognize the ability of this amazing actress, who should have been nominated already for The Departed and Nothing But the Truth? Maybe the third time is the charm. Farmiga brilliantly plays Alex Goran as a woman totally in control of every element of her life. That's what George Clooney's Ryan Bingham is drawn to. He's a man who has long thought (and preached as a speaker) that the only way to have true control over leading the life you want, you need to "empty your backpack" of traditional elements like family, friends, and even a job. When Bingham fires people, he even encourages them to find what they want in life. Alex is a woman who has what she truly wants and that confidence draws Ryan in and, ultimately, shatters his worldview. His oh-so-confident life model may not be the only one out there. Farmiga is funny, confident, sexy, and perfectly cast.

 

**********
 
 
 
 

Julianne Moore in A Single Man.


I'm usually loathe to picking small, cameo-sized roles for supporting actor or actress consideration but I'll make an exception for what Ms. Moore does with just a few minutes in A Single Man. The entirety of her part probably doesn't total much more than ten minutes, but it's such a crucial ten minutes to the arc of the lead character and the mood of the overall film that it defines "supporting." Colin Firth's acclaimed performance and the overall melancholy of the film aren't the same without the choices made by one of the best actresses alive. Moore plays a woman who is desperately trying to cling to youth and happiness that have left her behind while also still dealing with the tragically unrequited love for her gay best friend (Firth). We don't see her too much, but Moore telegraphs so much with so little. Charley drinks too much and, when she does, she laments the life that she doesn't have any more and the one that she never did. She's borderline tragic without being at all melodramatic.

 

**********
 
 
WINNER
 
Anna Kendrick as Natalie Keener in Up in the Air
 
 

Anna Kendrick in Up in the Air.

As is often the case, the most notable supporting actress performance of the year is so not as much for the choices that were made but the pitfalls that were avoided. In the hands of 99 out of 100 actresses, Natalie Keener is a shrill, whiny, cliché of a character – a cocky young lady who learns a serious life lesson from the more experienced older man who mentors her. Yawn. We've seen that before. The tough assignment handed to Kendrick was to take that character model and make it feel genuine. From her first minute on-screen, Kendrick registers as more than a cliché. There are millions of young ladies like her out there, people who think they have it all figured out in their early 20s and will learn that life has more in store for them than their college experience has taught them. Kendrick gives a three-dimensional performance immediately but it's when she's handed the more emotional material later in the film that she rises to the top. Funny, charming, and very moving, Kendrick gives a star-making performance.


**********
 
 
Bookmark/Search this post with:
Posted by Turk182 in Awards Watch, Features - December 15, 2009 at 8:12 AM
 
Ann Kendrick in UP IN THE AIR

VML at Dec 19 2009 04:34:33
According to director/screenwriter Jason Reitman, Ann Kendrick's character in UP IN THE AIR was written just for her. The same goes for Vera Farmiga.
 
 
 
 
Tell a Friend about MovieRetriever.com
Email your friends, Invite them to join the MovieRetriever.com community to create and share movie lists and review them.
 
MovieRetriever.com members can:
  • Rate movies
  • Write your own reviews
  • Create your movie watch lists
  • Share lists with the community